DuoKey
Ressourcen
Artikel

Data Sovereignty in Microsoft 365: Residency, Keys and Legal Access

Data sovereignty in Microsoft 365 depends on where data sits, who holds the keys and which law applies. EU Data Boundary, Customer Key and DKE compared.

Josua Rochat··8 Min. Lesezeit

Data sovereignty in Microsoft 365 means keeping control over who can access your mail, files and chats, and under which law, not only over where they are stored. Microsoft's residency commitments decide the location. The encryption model decides who can decrypt. For most tenants the answer to the second question is still Microsoft, unless a key sits outside Microsoft's reach.

This guide separates the three questions a sovereignty programme has to answer, maps Microsoft's options to each, and shows where a customer-held key changes the outcome.


Table of Contents

  1. Residency is not sovereignty
  2. Where your data sits: Microsoft's residency options
  3. Which law can reach it
  4. Who can decrypt it: encryption options compared
  5. Matching the control to the data
  6. Contractual and organisational measures
  7. How DuoKey fits
  8. Checklist
  9. FAQ

Residency is not sovereignty

A data sovereignty requirement for Microsoft 365 usually breaks down into three questions:

QuestionWhat answers it in Microsoft 365
Where is the data stored and processed?Data residency commitments: EU Data Boundary, Advanced Data Residency, Multi-Geo
Which legal orders can reach it?The provider's legal exposure, contracts and the jurisdiction of whoever holds the keys
Who can technically decrypt it?The encryption model: Microsoft-managed keys, Customer Key, or Double Key Encryption

Residency answers the first question only. Data stored in a Swiss or EU data centre is still readable by the service that holds the key. That is why sovereignty programmes end up discussing keys.


Where your data sits: Microsoft's residency options

Microsoft documents several residency offerings for Microsoft 365. (Microsoft Learn: EU Data Boundary for Microsoft 365)

  • EU Data Boundary. A geographic boundary within which Microsoft commits to store and process Customer Data and personal data for its enterprise online services, including Microsoft 365. It covers EU and EFTA countries, Switzerland included. Microsoft 365 tenants with a sign-up location in the EU or EFTA are in scope. Microsoft documents limited circumstances where data is still transferred outside the boundary.
  • Product Terms Data Residency. Residency commitments included at no additional cost for eligible tenants.
  • Advanced Data Residency. A paid add-on that extends residency commitments to more workloads.
  • Multi-Geo. Lets one tenant spread storage across several geographies. Microsoft notes that tenants with Multi-Geo are not in scope for the EU Data Boundary.

These commitments are about location. None of them changes who holds the keys.


Which law can reach it

The legal question is about the provider, not the data centre. The US Department of Justice explains that the CLOUD Act covers data "within such provider's possession, custody, or control, regardless of whether such communication, record, or other information is located within or outside of the United States," and calls the Act "encryption neutral." (DOJ white paper: The Purpose and Impact of the CLOUD Act)

Encryption neutral means the law neither requires nor forbids decryption. In practice, what a provider can produce depends on whether it holds a usable key. If it does, it can produce plaintext. If the decisive key sits with you, it can produce ciphertext only.

European regulators reached a similar conclusion for transfers. In its Recommendations 01/2020 on supplementary measures, the European Data Protection Board accepts strong encryption as an effective measure when the keys stay under the control of the data exporter, and finds no effective technical measure when a cloud provider needs the data in the clear to deliver its service. (EDPB Recommendations 01/2020)

This is a planning view, not legal advice. Whether a given setup meets a specific law or contract is a question for your counsel.


Who can decrypt it: encryption options compared

Default encryptionCustomer KeyBYOK for the Azure RMS root keyDouble Key Encryption
What it protectsAll data at rest (BitLocker, DKM)Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, Copilot interactions, Windows 365Purview Information Protection encryptionSelected items with a DKE label
Where your key livesMicrosoftAzure Key Vault or Managed HSM, in your subscriptionsAzure Key VaultYour DKE service, outside Microsoft
Can Microsoft 365 decrypt in normal operation?YesYes, for services you authoriseYesNo. Both keys are required
Features keptAllAllAllNo web co-authoring, search or Copilot on protected items
Sovereignty effectLocation onlyLifecycle control and an exit path ending in cryptographic deletionLifecycle control of the label root keyMicrosoft cannot produce readable content on its own

Sources: Customer Key overview, Azure Rights Management root key, Double Key Encryption.

Customer Key and BYOK are covered in Microsoft Purview Customer Key. DKE is defined in what Double Key Encryption is. The direct comparison is DKE vs Microsoft 365 Customer Key.


Matching the control to the data

DKE removes features, so it is not a tenant-wide setting. Sovereignty programmes that work classify first, then apply the control per class.

Data classTypical control
General collaborationDefault encryption inside the EU Data Boundary
Regulated data that must stay searchable and usable with CopilotCustomer Key, for lifecycle control and a documented exit
M&A, board papers, legal privilege, trade secrets, client-identifying data under secrecy rulesA Double Key Encryption label, with the key held outside Microsoft

Microsoft itself positions DKE for a small share of content, about 5% in its own illustration. The point of classification is to make that share explicit and defensible to an auditor. The broader model behind this split is described in BYOK vs HYOK.

For Swiss organisations, the same logic applies to public-sector and banking secrecy requirements. See Microsoft 365 for Swiss public administration and data sovereignty in Switzerland.


Contractual and organisational measures

Technical controls carry most of the weight, but the EDPB also expects contractual and organisational measures around them:

  • Contracts. Review Microsoft's Data Protection Addendum and Product Terms, including the documented EU Data Boundary transfers.
  • Classification. Publish a sensitivity label scheme that says which content gets a DKE label and why.
  • Key governance. Decide who may authorise use of the external key, who audits it, and who can revoke it.
  • Request handling. Write down how the organisation responds if a provider or authority asks for protected content.
  • Testing. Test key revocation and key-service outages before production.

How DuoKey fits

DuoKey provides the external key for Microsoft 365 Double Key Encryption:

  • The key is held in a DuoKey vault and split across MPC nodes, so it is never whole on one machine.
  • The DKE endpoint is deployed from DuoKey Cockpit, without building and hosting Microsoft's sample service.
  • A Zero Trust policy decides who may unwrap: user, group, location, IP and time.
  • GetKey and Decrypt events are logged per service for audit.
  • It runs as Swiss-operated DuoKey, or with Cockpit on-premises or on OpenShift.

See DuoKey for Microsoft 365 and the DKE setup guide. To shortlist providers, use six operational criteria for a DKE provider.


Checklist

  • Confirm whether the tenant is in scope for the EU Data Boundary, and note the documented transfers
  • List the legal regimes that can reach your provider and your key holder
  • Classify data and name the slice Microsoft must not read on its own
  • Choose Customer Key, DKE or both per class
  • Decide who operates the external key, where, and at what availability target
  • Test revocation and an outage of the key service

FAQ

What is data sovereignty in Microsoft 365?

It is control over where Microsoft 365 data is stored, which legal orders can reach it, and who can technically decrypt it. Residency options answer the first point. The encryption model answers the last one.

Does the EU Data Boundary make Microsoft 365 sovereign?

It keeps storage and processing in EU and EFTA countries, with documented exceptions. It does not change who holds the encryption keys, so Microsoft's services can still decrypt the data.

Is Switzerland covered by the EU Data Boundary?

Yes. Microsoft lists Switzerland among the EFTA countries in the EU Data Boundary, and lists Swiss data centres among the locations it uses.

Does Customer Key give data sovereignty?

It gives lifecycle control over root keys and an exit path that ends in cryptographic deletion. Microsoft 365 services still decrypt the data in normal operation, so it does not stop the provider from reading it.

Which Microsoft 365 option keeps data unreadable to Microsoft?

Double Key Encryption. Labelled content needs both Microsoft's key and your key, and your key stays outside Microsoft. The trade-off is that web co-authoring, search and Copilot do not work on that content.

Does encryption protect against the CLOUD Act?

It changes what a provider can produce. If the provider holds no usable key, it can hand over only ciphertext. The DOJ describes the Act as encryption neutral. Whether that meets a specific legal requirement is a question for counsel.

Teilen

Geschrieben von

Josua Rochat

Sprechen Sie über die Entscheidungen, die für Ihr Sicherheitsprogramm zählen.

Sagen Sie uns, wo Kontrolle heute schwierig ist. Wir helfen Ihnen, den nächsten praktischen Schritt zu finden.